Hi,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:58:01PM +, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> This seems a nice precedent:
> -
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-collections-users/m8FnCcmtC88
Right, this is pretty much what I had in mind as well. Whether one would create
a dedicated mailing list like hi
On 10 December 2015 at 12:12, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:58:01PM +, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>> This seems a nice precedent:
>> -
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-collections-users/m8FnCcmtC88
>
> Right, this is pretty much what I had in mind
Hi,
> > So basically I would suggest:
> >
> > - Put the forum into a read only mode
> > - Add a banner explaining the move to Stackoverflow (similar in content to
> > what's in the post
> > mentioned above)
> > - Create a Hibernate Team on Stackoverflow
> > - Make sure all Hibernate related tag
You know my thoughts on the forum. I think forum versus mailing list is
just very much a personal preference. Some people really like one or the
other. Why not split the middle and use mailing list + nabble?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015, 7:35 AM Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > So basically I w
BTW, there is already a hibernate-users mailing list hosted on the JBoss
Mailman instance. Back when we moved to JBoss Mailman they used to set up
a number of lists by default. We just chose to not really use this one in
particular. We could use this one for purpose discussed here.
BTW, I looke
I am not really sure what "have their headers patched to declare that the
new guides are the canonical version" means in practical terms...
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:55 AM Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 9 December 2015 at 16:36, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > We could leave the ones that are on docs.jb
If anyone is unfamiliar with Nabble... Here is the Nabble-ized form of this
very mailing list: http://hibernate-development.74578.x6.nabble.com/
It looks/works just like a forum. For mailing-list backed Nabble forums it is
read-only in effect, unless you also subscribe to the mailing list.
On Th
On 10 December 2015 at 15:24, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> BTW, there is already a hibernate-users mailing list hosted on the JBoss
> Mailman instance. Back when we moved to JBoss Mailman they used to set up a
> number of lists by default. We just chose to not really use this one in
> particular. We
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:43 AM Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> On 10 December 2015 at 15:24, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > BTW, there is already a hibernate-users mailing list hosted on the JBoss
> > Mailman instance. Back when we moved to JBoss Mailman they used to set
> up a
> > number of lists by def
On 10 December 2015 at 17:48, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:43 AM Sanne Grinovero
> wrote:
>>
>> On 10 December 2015 at 15:24, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>> > BTW, there is already a hibernate-users mailing list hosted on the JBoss
>> > Mailman instance. Back when we moved to JB
On 10 December 2015 at 15:26, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I am not really sure what "have their headers patched to declare that the
> new guides are the canonical version" means in practical terms...
It means that the HTML pages of the documentation should have some
metadata within the header section
I just sent the request.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:26 PM Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> On 10 December 2015 at 17:48, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:43 AM Sanne Grinovero
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10 December 2015 at 15:24, Steve Ebersole
> wrote:
> >> > BTW, there is already
I personally don't see the need for this. As far as I know this has never
been a feature request from a user, either. We already have so many
configuration options, I prefer to add them only when there is a clear
reason or a clear user desire. I don't see either here, personally.
On Tue, Dec 8,
I never said "the JPA is not smooth". I've never even used your framework,
how would I know that? ;)
I asked "Are there any changes in Hibernate that would make this work more
smoothly?"
We need you to tell us what would help you..
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:36 AM babyfish wrote:
> Hi hibernat
Just to follow up on this.. for ORM I went ahead and protected master, 5.0,
4.3 and 4.2 branches.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:33 AM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> This has always made me nervous ever since it happened a few times
> inadvertently after first moving to git. Thanks for pointing out that
Well to be clear... ConnectionAcquitionMode is not yet hooked in. I'll add
that as another task for 5.1; given the work Andrea and I did for
transaction handling, this should be a pretty easy change.
--
View this message in context:
http://hibernate-development.74578.x6.nabble.com/hibernate-de
Was already there :) https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-5184
--
View this message in context:
http://hibernate-development.74578.x6.nabble.com/hibernate-dev-Why-does-Hibernate-has-aggressive-connection-releasing-for-JTA-tp759p905.html
Sent from the Hibernate Development mailing list ar
Hello,
I have been working on a change to the pooled optimizer that we have been
seeing good performance results with. Basically it hands out blocks of ID's to
a thread local, rather than having every thread contend on the lock every time
an ID is required.
https://github.com/hibernate/hiberna
18 matches
Mail list logo
