On 9 December 2015 at 07:02, Vlad Mihalcea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree that a value of 1 is sufficient too. Once a user posted a
> Hibernate-related question, there is no way he will want to spam the forum.
+1
Is that possible with our current forum?
I think I proposed something similar before but d
I think we have the option.
Administration Control Panel -> Post Settings
Enable queued posts: Yes
Maximum post count for queued posts: 1
I have activated and I will test it with a new account.
Vlad
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> On 9 December 2015 at 07:02, Vlad M
Nice!
It works guys. Go to the forum and check the post that I entered.
It has a question mark attached and if you log out you cannot see it.
This got to discourage the spammers, for sure.
Vlad
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Vlad Mihalcea
wrote:
> I think we have the option.
>
> Administrat
Hi,
I think one thing not mentioned on this thread is the fact that we are not
controlling
the root of the webserver (afaik). The docs are hosted on docs.jboss.org and I
think we
only have write access to the hibernate sub-folder. And even if we had access
to the root
and could modify robots.t
Related to this, the sitemap is limited to 50k entries and hosting multiple
projects, each one with tons of pages, is going to limit the number of
entries we get in the sitemap.
Is there any change we host the docs on hibernate.org and simply redirect
the old pages from
http://docs.jboss.org/hiber
Hi,
> I also think we should keep the forum it's a way to reach the actual dev
> team. On SO, you get answers for the community.
I am confused. Is the whole forum not about community as well? I would assume
that
there are many questions which are discussed and solved by the community itself
w/o
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:12:54PM +0200, Vlad Mihalcea wrote:
> Is there any change we host the docs on hibernate.org and simply redirect
> the old pages from
>
> http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate
>
> to
>
> http://hibernate.org/orm/documentation
That would be an option I guess. Host the do
Interesting thoughts.
In last 6 days we got 24 questions about Hibernate and around 30-40 spam
messages.
That's why I think it's good to have that option enabled, otherwise the
forum will not look professional at all.
Once a user has been accepted, any new post will propagate automatically.
So it
Interesting about the SO Teams feature, I had not seen that yet. I'll
have to look at it.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015, 7:43 AM Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I also think we should keep the forum it's a way to reach the actual dev
> > team. On SO, you get answers for the community.
>
> I am con
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 02:00:06PM +, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Interesting about the SO Teams feature, I had not seen that yet. I'll
> have to look at it.
It is quite new. Only around for a few weeks. I think the Stackoverflow team
is not 100% sure how things will work out in the long t
On 9 December 2015 at 13:54, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:12:54PM +0200, Vlad Mihalcea wrote:
>> Is there any change we host the docs on hibernate.org and simply redirect
>> the old pages from
>>
>> http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate
>>
>> to
>>
>> http://hibernate.or
To complement some of the sentiment, SO is awesome to answer questions on the
project. But not to get interactions with the users to get the right use case,
exchange on potential bugs to later open JIRAs etc.
> On 08 Dec 2015, at 08:46, Vlad Mihalcea wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was discussing with S
We could leave the ones that are on docs.jboss.org in place and just move
the current stable ones. I see no benefit to moving ORM 3.2 docs over e.g.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:08 AM Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 9 December 2015 at 13:54, Hardy Ferentschik
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 09,
On 9 December 2015 at 16:36, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> We could leave the ones that are on docs.jboss.org in place and just move
> the current stable ones. I see no benefit to moving ORM 3.2 docs over e.g.
I'm ok to leave them there, but if we do they at least need to have
their headers patched to
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 05:18:23PM +0100, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> To complement some of the sentiment, SO is awesome to answer questions on the
> project.
> But not to get interactions with the users to get the right use case,
> exchange on potential
> bugs to later open JIRAs etc.
Sure
On 9 December 2015 at 20:49, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 05:18:23PM +0100, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>> To complement some of the sentiment, SO is awesome to answer questions on
>> the project.
>> But not to get interactions with the users to get the right use case,
Sounds reasonable and straightforward.
I subscribe to have dedicated channels to our community and to make it
clear which one is best suited for a given topic.
Vlad
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> On 9 December 2015 at 20:49, Hardy Ferentschik
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
17 matches
Mail list logo
