[sebersole@t540 in.relation.to] $ rake check
rake aborted!
Don't know how to build task 'check'
^^ expected? `rake setup` finished successfully. This next step failed
for me.
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jb
FWIW the check command failed, but then `rake preview` seems to run fine (I
can view the site locally). I guess the severity of this depends on what
check is meant to do...
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:24 AM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> [sebersole@t540 in.relation.to] $ rake check
> rake aborted!
> Do
Worth keeping these around anymore? They are woefully out of date.
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
+1
On 24 Jul 2015 15:54, "Steve Ebersole" wrote:
> Clarification... the issues scheduled for 5.0.0+ all need to be resolved
> *or* moved from 5.0.0+
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 7:32 AM Steve Ebersole
> wrote:
>
> > Well there is still a lot of issues scheduled for `5.0.0+`. Those would
> > all
Hi Max, could you make an example please?
Looks like you are interpreting Steve's email in a different way than me.
On 24 Jul 2015 21:43, "Max Rydahl Andersen" wrote:
> On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:48, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
> > Do we want to consider automatically applying known database limits on
> >
He is talking about native (sql) queries. If a user defines a native query
using his example column name MY_SUPER_AWESOME_COLUMN_NAME_CANT_ALWAYS_BE_USED,
then when we replace that because they deploy on to "database product X"
which limits identifier lengths to 10... he worries that the users que
