Hi Gunnar,
thanks for your reply, see the comments inline.
- Original Message -
> From: "Gunnar Morling"
> To: "Jiri Holusa"
> Cc: hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 8:55:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Support for Elasticsearch in Hibernate OGM
> prop
$subject
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
On Thu 2014-08-21 19:48, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On 21 Jan 2014, at 17:03, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
> > Your idea of reusing Jandex won't quite fully work when people put their
> > classes in different jars.
>
> Well, the assumption of course is that we can handed a aggregated/composite
see $subject
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
Hi there,
A couple of months ago I started GPG signing my emails. As it turns out the
hibernate-dev mailing list silently ignored/discarded all my emails since then.
As per configuration all emails with any type of attachment were ignored. Hence
the two months radio silence of mine.
Some of you
On 21 Jan 2014, at 15:50, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> HSEARCH-383 - Hibernate Search does not respect the @AccessType
> annotation in respect to @Id fields.
>
> is that we don't necessarily follow the same rules as Hibernate ORM.
> Also we're currently aiming at more flexible models, not least as
On 21 Jan 2014, at 15:50, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> HSEARCH-383 - Hibernate Search does not respect the @AccessType
> annotation in respect to @Id fields.
>
> is that we don't necessarily follow the same rules as Hibernate ORM.
> Also we're currently aiming at more flexible models, not least as
> Another thing I forgot to mention is that I'm hoping that I will be able to
> dump Bobo Browse in favor of Hibernate Search faceting. Currently, HSearch
> is too limited still in this respect and I hope this will change with the
> new features of Lucene in this area.
+1, I am hoping to spend so
On 21 Jan 2014, at 15:30, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> I do like you do.
I often do as well, but less than I used to do.
> But I can see why some fall back to the raw type as
> it's less "annoying" when developing.
Exactly. IMO there was a phase where wildcard types where used everywhere, with
l
On 22 Aug 2014, at 10:34, Jiri Holusa wrote:
>> An alternative which may be a bit simpler and give quicker success for
>> simplistic queries would be to implement an ES backend of our pluggable
>> HQL/JP-QL parser. We already have implementations of this which take HQL
>> queries and translate t
For the record, this is not all attachments. There is a white list of
MIME accepted and a blacklist of extensions like the good old .exe.
Anyways, for those like Hardy that do not want to keep their plausible
deniability options and want to sign their emails, the list now accepts
the gpg-signature
2014-08-22 14:01 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bernard :
>
> On 22 Aug 2014, at 10:34, Jiri Holusa wrote:
>
> An alternative which may be a bit simpler and give quicker success for
> simplistic queries would be to implement an ES backend of our pluggable
> HQL/JP-QL parser. We already have implementations o
> Interesting, I really need to take a closer look at ES and its APIs.
>
> How does it react when searching on an un-indexed field? If we can detect
> the situation and raise a meaningful exception indicating that an index is
> missing so a given query can't be run (could even be done during star
On Thu 2014-08-07 9:10, John Worrell wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel et al.,
>
> My apologies for the log radio silence. I've taken a look at the code-base
> on Jon Halliday's repo, and have set up a nick on freenode - #jlesinge.
No worries I was on holidays.
And you email was the few lucky ones that I had
On 08/14/2014 12:32 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Or you could just ask them ;)
I might not getting enough detail from the answer. Best to have trace
output. Speaking of which,
https://gist.github.com/scottmarlow/b7fe320f5a2ea7969170 shows a
transaction scoped persistence context is created wit
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> I understand. If this is a good time for your team to do such
> experiments, I'm willing to switch to weekly tags, or even bi-weekly
> if there's need, as two other teams seem to be in the same good mood
We'll have the bandwidth starting f
16 matches
Mail list logo
