I have had a chat with Gail on $subject and promised to give my
feedback.
First of, I would argue that the user is doing something relatively
wrong on my weirdo scale. I am not massively bothered with whatever
solution we end up choosing.
When the same state is present in both instances, you guys
Just a heads up that as or tomorrow (April 10) we should see the Jira /
GitHub issues resolved. The last 2 issues we have been waiting on were
just resolved:
1) https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/DCON-391
2) https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/DCON-393
Essentially this most recent problem has been
Looks nice Marc
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> Sweet :)
>
> On 07 Apr 2014, at 19:03, Marc Schipperheyn
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On another note I just wanted to mention the new release of Ology,
> > www.ology.com.br.
> > It's a social network that can be seen a
Yes, I agree it is a shame.
BTW, did you see we just released yet another 4.2? ;)
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Marc Schipperheyn wrote:
> Fair enough. It's a shame though. Like it or not, there are tons of people
> using Spring and I'm guessing the vast majority will not be on 4.0 any time
Nice, thanks Steve.
Do I need to change something in project configuration to benefit from
the automatic linking?
On 9 April 2014 13:37, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Just a heads up that as or tomorrow (April 10) we should see the Jira /
> GitHub issues resolved. The last 2 issues we have been waitin
No, it should happen automatically. *Should* :) This new round of DVCS
support has been far from smooth. I blame it on Atlassian being in the
DVCS game now with Stash. I don't think its hard to see that they focus
their DVCS testing there rather than GitHub.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Sa
So we need to decide how to best represent the identifier for the entity.
That's ultimately the disconnect here. Hibernate historically had 3 ways
to represent ids:
* simple - these were explicitly basic type ids: longs, ints, strings, etc.
==
* aggregated composite - essentially @EmbeddedId
*
I always thought that type annotations would allow us to look via
refection to annotations like
public class Foo {
public Set< @NotNull String> names;
}
But looking at some tutorials like
http://jaxenter.com/jsr-308-explained-java-type-annotations-49929.html
it seems that these an
2014-04-09 21:01 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bernard :
> I always thought that type annotations would allow us to look via
> refection to annotations like
>
> public class Foo {
>public Set< @NotNull String> names;
> }
>
> But looking at some tutorials like
> http://jaxenter.com/jsr-308-exp
Cool, I’ll be able to sleep tonight :)
On 09 Apr 2014, at 21:19, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> 2014-04-09 21:01 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bernard :
> I always thought that type annotations would allow us to look via
> refection to annotations like
>
> public class Foo {
>public Set< @NotNull Str
Envers looks at @MappedSuperclass ClassInfo to see if it has any attributes
that are audited. If it finds one, then Envers has to find the corresponding
AttributeBinding in the EntityBinding to get it's access type, column names,
etc.
I don't think it really requires a MappedSuperclassBinding,
Indeed!
Thanks for sharing, always nice to see such achievements.
Sanne
On 9 April 2014 13:38, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Looks nice Marc
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Emmanuel Bernard
> wrote:
>
>> Sweet :)
>>
>> On 07 Apr 2014, at 19:03, Marc Schipperheyn
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
12 matches
Mail list logo
