Re: [hibernate-dev] [Search] Spatial still experimental

2013-12-19 Thread Hardy Ferentschik
On 16 Jan 2013, at 08:32, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > - spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to use > geolocation maybe geoquery when I try to explain the notion. not sure. IMO spatial is the right term. I find relocation less appealing, but better than geoquery which g

Re: [hibernate-dev] [Search] Spatial still experimental

2013-12-19 Thread Gunnar Morling
2013/12/19 Hardy Ferentschik > > On 16 Jan 2013, at 08:32, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > > > - spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to use > > geolocation maybe geoquery when I try to explain the notion. > > not sure. IMO spatial is the right term. I find relocation less ap

Re: [hibernate-dev] [Search] Spatial still experimental

2013-12-19 Thread Hardy Ferentschik
On 19 Jan 2013, at 13:13, Gunnar Morling wrote: > 2013/12/19 Hardy Ferentschik > > On 16 Jan 2013, at 08:32, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > > > - spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to use > > geolocation maybe geoquery when I try to explain the notion. > > not sure. I

[hibernate-dev] [Search] Search 5 and architecture review

2013-12-19 Thread Hardy Ferentschik
Hi, IMO we should rethink how we describe the architecture of Search and especially its extension points. I think for Search 5 we will need to review/rewrite the documentation (maybe as part of moving to asciidoc) and clear out some of the ambiguities we have in the used terminology. For exam

Re: [hibernate-dev] [Search] Spatial still experimental

2013-12-19 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-1469 https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-1470 On Thu 2013-12-19 12:36, Hardy Ferentschik wrote: > > On 16 Jan 2013, at 08:32, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > > > - spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to use > > geol

Re: [hibernate-dev] [Search] Spatial still experimental

2013-12-19 Thread Sanne Grinovero
nice, thanks all. Optimistically labelled these issues as 5.0 Also, there are other issues open already which suggested API improvements: so while indeed the API isn't new anymore, we haven't properly incorporated all feedback. Looks like we all agree it stays experimental for now. On 19 Decembe

Re: [hibernate-dev] [Search] Search 5 and architecture review

2013-12-19 Thread Sanne Grinovero
On 19 December 2013 15:19, Hardy Ferentschik wrote: > Hi, > > IMO we should rethink how we describe the architecture of Search and > especially its extension points. > I think for Search 5 we will need to review/rewrite the documentation (maybe > as part of moving to asciidoc) and clear out some