Hi,
In the context of embedded associations for CouchDB [1], I'm working on
support for configuring the association storage mode using our new option
system [2]. I can see the following "axes" of configuration here:
* via annotation
- on an association property
- on a type
* via the option AP
On 2 Jan 2013, at 18:12, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Well technically it is not valid according to the javac spec, which was
> David's point (which I assume who you are referring to).
What is against the spec? To run 'javac -proc:only’?
> And in fact we get a slew of errors from running `javac -
On Tue 03 Dec 2013 04:39:43 AM CST, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On 2 Jan 2013, at 18:12, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
>> Well technically it is not valid according to the javac spec, which was
>> David's point (which I assume who you are referring to).
>
> What is against the spec? To run 'javac -pr
On 3 Jan 2013, at 13:29, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>>> And in fact we get a slew of errors from running `javac -proc:only`. We
>>> just happen to eat/ignore them.
>>
>> Sure, in some cases you might have to run the processors as part of the main
>> compile. Still, imo nothing wrong with the way
Thanks, Davide.
2013/12/3 Davide D'Alto
> It looks good to me.
>
Ok.
> I first didn't like that but I came to think it makes sense, if the
> property name conveys that semantics, e.g. "defaultAssociationStorageMode".
>
> I don't think it's necessary to use the prefix "default". For me it is
>
If I understand correctly, What you are suggesting instead, it is to have
two different names for the same property (), defaultHost in the
persistence.xml and host in the API, this means that I have to know how to
call a property based on the place where I want to set it. This is
confusing for me.
I am quite uncomfortable with that approach.
Here is what I propose instead (we did discuss that in the past a bit).
Rules by decreasing precedence:
property | association > class > super class > global
(*) question: what about overridden properties
For a given level mentioned above,
API > ann
On Tue 2013-12-03 17:48, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Thanks, Davide.
>
> 2013/12/3 Davide D'Alto
>
> > It looks good to me.
> >
>
> Ok.
>
> > I first didn't like that but I came to think it makes sense, if the
> > property name conveys that semantics, e.g. "defaultAssociationStorageMode".
> >
> >
We probably need to revisit what we really want to test and adjust the
test accordingly. AFAIR, these tests felt weak anyways.
On Fri 2013-11-29 11:49, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on support for embedded associations in CouchDB [1]. Checking
> how this is mapped by the MongoDB dia
Thanks for following up on this.
2013/12/3 Emmanuel Bernard
> We probably need to revisit what we really want to test and adjust the
> test accordingly. AFAIR, these tests felt weak anyways.
>
Yes, that has been on my agenda for some day anyways. Test failures are
hard to analyze as the asserti
For various reasons I need to cut a second CR for 4.3. I will do that
release on Thursday the 5th.
Prior to that I need to make sure that both the JPA TCK and the
persistence portions of the EE TCK (within WidlFly) pass; trouble is
that the jobs which run the persistence portions of the EE TCK
11 matches
Mail list logo
