Hi guys,
I'm glad to announce/let you know I'll be presenting OGM at Soft Shake
(Geneva, Switzerland) in October.
Cheers
Guillaume
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
Congratulations!
Good job,
Sanne
On 26 July 2013 13:36, Guillaume SCHEIBEL wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm glad to announce/let you know I'll be presenting OGM at Soft Shake
> (Geneva, Switzerland) in October.
>
>
> Cheers
> Guillaume
> ___
> hibernate-dev m
Great job,
Davide
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Guillaume SCHEIBEL <
guillaume.schei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm glad to announce/let you know I'll be presenting OGM at Soft Shake
> (Geneva, Switzerland) in October.
>
>
> Cheers
> Guillaume
>
I just released the "Final" JPA API jar. It is still using the old
naming scheme in terms of repo artifacts; so this one is:
groupId : org.hibernate.javax.persistence
artifactId : hibernate-jpa-2.1-api
version : 1.0.0.Final
I think moving forward we will move to a slightly different scheme. The
On 26 Jan 2013, at 7:26 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I just released the "Final" JPA API jar. It is still using the old
> naming scheme in terms of repo artifacts; so this one is:
>
> groupId : org.hibernate.javax.persistence
> artifactId : hibernate-jpa-2.1-api
> version : 1.0.0.Final
nice
Well the problem comes up in versions like '1.0.0.Draft-7plus', which
was Draft-7 + some stuff we had just discussed in the EG. Or what
about cases where we are combining work from a few drafts? All in all,
its not great.
What I was thinking instead is to use Alpha/Beta/CR and in the Jira
no
On 26 July 2013 18:51, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On 26 Jan 2013, at 7:26 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
>> I just released the "Final" JPA API jar. It is still using the old
>> naming scheme in terms of repo artifacts; so this one is:
>>
>> groupId : org.hibernate.javax.persistence
>> artifactId
I do not agree with needing to see this in the artifact name. I can see
putting it in the metadata (pom, manifest, etc) in addition to Jira.
'draft' does in deed fit into the chronology scheme defined by JBoss.
Except that 'draft' is not defined as a valid value.
Here is another thing to cons