Hi Amit,
please use the developer list for such concerns, which I've added in CC.
Personally I don't think your issue is valid, but I'll leave that to
the other team members to decide.
We never promised backwards compatibility with other frameworks when
upgrading from Hibernate 3 to 4, it is likel
If you want the un-proxied version of the JBDC Connection, then
unwrap() it. That is the standard pattern for dealing with JDBC
objects.
And no, this is not a backwards compatibility problem.
On Fri 15 Feb 2013 06:52:33 AM CST, amit shah wrote:
> I think the defect description was not clear pr
Since it it's a different mayor release, such changes are expected.
We always work hard to maintain backwards compatibility, but occasionally
we need to make significant improvements which will break compatibility:
Hibernate 4.x is significantly different than Hibernate 3.x and such
changes are by
Exactly. You are relying, externally, on an internal detail of
Hibernate. These are connections controlled by Hibernate. Plus, as
Sanne already mentioned, you are talking about behavior across
different major versions.
pass it Connection.class. Or, yes, you can also pass it a more
concre
