Hi guys,
We would really like to have Hibernate 4 in Fedora 17 (ultimately for
the installation of AS 7 [1]).
Problem is: there is no Gradle in Fedora [2], so it is impossible to
build Hibernate 4 with the given Gradle scripts.
Do you guys see a solution for this stale-mate?
Maybe we can get s
Carlo,
Are there gradle jiras for making gradle safe enough to include in Fedora?
Scott
On 03/28/2012 07:03 AM, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> We would really like to have Hibernate 4 in Fedora 17 (ultimately for
> the installation of AS 7 [1]).
>
> Problem is: there is no Gradle in Fedora
I guess my first question is why there is not Gradle available. Strong
has done lots of work to make Gradle work in Brew; isn't that what
Fedora uses as well?
On 03/28/2012 06:03 AM, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> We would really like to have Hibernate 4 in Fedora 17 (ultimately for
> the
We are having a good discussion about this on #fedora-java...
On Wed 28 Mar 2012 08:46:42 AM CDT, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I guess my first question is why there is not Gradle available. Strong
> has done lots of work to make Gradle work in Brew; isn't that what
> Fedora uses as well?
>
>
> On 03
Gradle support in Koji (and therefore Fedora) is well underway :
http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/gradle/current/SPECS/gradle.spec?view=log
Unfortunately the plan as of now will be to support only a single
gradle version. I explained the future difficulties they will have
because of
That's the Mageia effort, it has nothing to do with Koji.
We can cherry pick though.
Long term Fedora can't keep up with a restraint on one version only.
Technically it must become possible to install multiple versions of
different components. For organizational reasons (maintenance burden and
I had to dismantle the Hibernate Search 4.1.0.CR3 tag on git :-(
sorry, I've been quick on it rather than waiting for general approval
to minimize changes of someone actually using it, since I had just
created it.
Cheers,
Sanne
___
hibernate-dev mailing
Should we do a meeting tomorrow? I don't think we really have anything
pressing at the moment.
John personally, I dont think doing it at 8am our time (US Central) is
too bad considering it is quite late evening already for Strong.
Strong, what do you think?
On Tue 27 Mar 2012 08:20:43 AM CD
Sure, that's fine. I was only throwing it out if it wasn't inconvenient for
anyone else.
On Mar 28, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Should we do a meeting tomorrow? I don't think we really have anything
> pressing at the moment.
>
> John personally, I dont think doing it at 8am our
I'm good to skip tomorrow, too.
On Mar 28, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Should we do a meeting tomorrow? I don't think we really have anything
> pressing at the moment.
>
> John personally, I dont think doing it at 8am our time (US Central) is too
> bad considering it is quite la
I'm fine with pushing it 1 hour later and I totally understand the painful of
getting up too earlier :D
but I remember Gail said she like the meeting time currently, 6 am, so she can
get some sleep after meeting, so, maybe we need to hear her option , anyway,
i'm fine with each time
--
anyone working on the pull requests? I saw there are some opened recently
-
Best Regards,
Strong Liu
http://about.me/stliu/bio
On Mar 29, 2012, at 2:57 AM, John Verhaeg wrote:
> I'm good to skip tomorrow, too.
>
> On Mar 28, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
>>
12 matches
Mail list logo
