Thanks Gunnar, sounds like a very reasonable plan +1
--Hardy
On Mar 26, 2012, at 10:27 PM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for the late response.
>
> I think we might start with the work on HV 5 as soon as we got HV
> 4.3.0.CR1 released. Ideally then we shouldn't have any further change
I got dropped from my portable internet and cannot connect at all at the
moment. We really need to change this meeting time. The current time is
unworkable for me every other week. Either we need to move this 2.5 hours
later or move it to another day. If another day, Thursday is the only other
day
Hi,
I am fine with moving the meeting 2 1/2 hours later. That's what we used to do
anyways
and it worked quite well imo.
--Hardy
On Mar 27, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I got dropped from my portable internet and cannot connect at all at the
> moment. We really need to change thi
okay, let's move it to thursday if no objections from others,
moving this 2.5 hours later means 11:30pm for me
-
Best Regards,
Strong Liu
http://about.me/stliu/bio
On Mar 27, 2012, at 9:13 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I got dropped from my portable internet and cannot co
I'm great with that.
On Mar 27, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am fine with moving the meeting 2 1/2 hours later. That's what we used to
> do anyways
> and it worked quite well imo.
>
> --Hardy
>
> On Mar 27, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
>> I got dropped
On Mar 27, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Strong Liu wrote:
> okay, let's move it to thursday if no objections from others,
>
> moving this 2.5 hours later means 11:30pm for me
Right. Not so nice maybe ;-) Thursday works for me as well
___
hibernate-dev mailing l
I'm good with Thursday, too, but it would be nice if it was at least one hour
later.
On Mar 27, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Strong Liu wrote:
> okay, let's move it to thursday if no objections from others,
>
> moving this 2.5 hours later means 11:30pm for me
> -
> Best Regards,
>
I think you usually need to run the whole class as the first method setups the
data, and the other methods read history.'
So you would always need to run at least 2. And I think that's not possible in
Idea.
Adam
On Mar 26, 2012, at 9:06 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Ok, I figured it out for whol
Well, yes, given that they are split that way I will agree there is
probably not a way in IntelliJ to run individual methods.
On Tue 27 Mar 2012 09:48:15 AM CDT, Adam Warski wrote:
> I think you usually need to run the whole class as the first method setups
> the data, and the other methods read
