So to take a decision on this, are we going to stick with the current
Lucene version in the 3.4 branch ?
Basically means to reject https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HSEARCH-885
-- Sanne
On 13 February 2012 17:04, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Hardy Ferentsc
I personally think we should not move to the next version of Lucene for this
branch.
On 27 févr. 2012, at 13:09, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> So to take a decision on this, are we going to stick with the current
> Lucene version in the 3.4 branch ?
>
> Basically means to reject https://hibernate.on
Ok, I've rejected the upgrade request:
https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HSEARCH-885?jwupdated=45019&focusedCommentId=45707#comment-45707
And sent a last pull request for 3.4
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-search/pull/240
-- Sanne
On 27 February 2012 12:21, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> I
Hi guys,
Today is the major day for code changes before tomorrow's release.
I think I will get HSEARCH-471 soft delete ready by tonight, I am working on
the documentation side. I've decided to disable dirty checking when this
feature is used. I still need feedback as per the pull request demand
On Feb 27, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> By the way, do you have a better name for this feature? It's literally
> indexing action interception.
As per comment on GitHub would prefer "indexing interception"
An alternative could be "(Entity) state dependent indexing"
--Hardy
