Re: [hibernate-dev] Shaded build for the HV annotation processor

2011-03-21 Thread Kevin Pollet
Hi guys, I've made an AP shaded jar and played with it in Eclipse, Netbeans and IntelliJ (it seems that all works fine :) I've also opened an issue HV-457 (http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HV-457) and If you want to try this approach I've created a topic branch with th

[hibernate-dev] HSEARCH-679 status

2011-03-21 Thread Tom Waterhouse
I see that HSEARCH-679 is scheduled to be released in Hibernate Search 3.4.0. I haven't seen any progress on the issue though. If it will help moving the issue along I can definitely test proposed solutions, we can reproduce the issue consistently. Unfortunately we've reproduced the issue during

Re: [hibernate-dev] Shaded build for the HV annotation processor

2011-03-21 Thread Gunnar Morling
Hi Kevin, great, thanks for the effort. I had tried the same locally before also with success within Eclipse. I'll comment on the issue. Gunnar 2011/3/21 Kevin Pollet > Hi guys, > > I've made an AP shaded jar and played with it in Eclipse, Netbeans and > IntelliJ (it seems that all works fine

Re: [hibernate-dev] JIRA notifications

2011-03-21 Thread Max Rydahl Andersen
tools should move to participant too. /max On Mar 19, 2011, at 11:06, Hardy Ferentschik wrote: > >> 1) Tools >> 5) Shards > Not sure about this ones > >> 2) Bean Validation >> 3) Bean Validation TCK > But these two can be changed as well > >> 4) Commons Annotations (on a side note did we ever

Re: [hibernate-dev] JIRA notifications

2011-03-21 Thread Gunnar Morling
Hi, the workflow looks like this: * A new issue is created -> the issue is in state "open" * Work begins -> perform workflow action "start progress" -> issue is in state "coding in progress" * Work is done -> perform workflow action "attach pull request" (enter the number of the pull request) ->

[hibernate-dev] Hibernate Search 3.4.0.Beta1

2011-03-21 Thread Hardy Ferentschik
All you have to know as usual on in.relation.to http://in.relation.to/18845.lace --Hardy ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

Re: [hibernate-dev] HSEARCH-679 status

2011-03-21 Thread Sanne Grinovero
Hi Tom, thanks for the reminder, you might have noticed we're very busy lately, so thank you for your help proposal. I've just committed a solution draft on my HSEARCH-679 branch: https://github.com/Sanne/hibernate-search/tree/HSEARCH-679 It's a draft but seems to work; I still have to get someo

Re: [hibernate-dev] HSEARCH-679 status

2011-03-21 Thread Tom Waterhouse
Sanne, the unit test doesn't make any assertions, so I don't know how useful it would be as a test. It allows a user to view the Hibernate-generated SQL, illustrating the entities loaded. On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > Hi Tom, > thanks for the reminder, you might have

Re: [hibernate-dev] HSEARCH-679 status

2011-03-21 Thread Sanne Grinovero
2011/3/21 Tom Waterhouse : > Sanne, the unit test doesn't make any assertions, so I don't know how useful > it would be as a test.  It allows a user to view the Hibernate-generated > SQL, illustrating the entities loaded. Yes I saw that :) so I was asking if you could make a unit test out of it to

[hibernate-dev] hibernate criteria query of collection-of-component and collection-of-value (HHH-3646)

2011-03-21 Thread David Mansfield
Hi all, I noticed that the target is 4.0 alpha 2 for this feature according to JIRA: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3646 Also, there is a request for a forward port of the changes to a git branch against master. I'd be willing to do this, and I've already created

Re: [hibernate-dev] hibernate criteria query of collection-of-component and collection-of-value (HHH-3646)

2011-03-21 Thread Steve Ebersole
Hi David. I was the one who requested help in converting this to a github pull request. Most definitely! I will make sure this gets into alpha2 if you do it up as a pull request. On Monday, March 21, 2011, at 07:57 pm, David Mansfield wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed that the target is 4.0 alp