[hibernate-dev] Hibernate Search 3.3.0

2010-01-07 Thread Manik Surtani
Hi guys Do you have an ETA on Hibernate Search 3.3.0, even early betas, etc? I'm particularly keen on HSEARCH-397 (to be able to finalise ISPN-194). Cheers -- Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org Lead, Infinispan Lead, JBoss Cache http://www.infinispan.org http://www.jbosscache.org __

Re: [hibernate-dev] Hibernate Search 3.3.0

2010-01-07 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
Most people are on JPA 2 atm. so Hibernate Search 3.2 is not getting as much attention as hoped. We need to do 3.2 beta2 3.2 beta 3 3.2 final and then we can think about a 3.3 timeframe. In particular the Query DSL has not moved (I think it's more important for infinispan than HSEARCH-397). On

Re: [hibernate-dev] Hibernate Search 3.3.0

2010-01-07 Thread Manik Surtani
On 7 Jan 2010, at 13:18, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > Most people are on JPA 2 atm. so Hibernate Search 3.2 is not getting as much > attention as hoped. > We need to do 3.2 beta2 3.2 beta 3 3.2 final and then we can think about a > 3.3 timeframe. > > In particular the Query DSL has not moved (I t

Re: [hibernate-dev] Hibernate Search 3.3.0

2010-01-07 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
I don't think you can realistically remove a tech preview flag from a query API which does not have a decent query builder :) On 7 janv. 2010, at 14:33, Manik Surtani wrote: > > On 7 Jan 2010, at 13:18, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > >> Most people are on JPA 2 atm. so Hibernate Search 3.2 is not g

Re: [hibernate-dev] Reelase for

2010-01-07 Thread Steve Ebersole
Sure, let's do one at the beginning of next week. On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 18:11 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > Steve, > Do you think there is enough material / bug fix to cut another beta > for inclusion in AS 6 M2? > Something like a 2 weeks target. > > > On my side that would make sense to pu

[hibernate-dev] criteria + SUM

2010-01-07 Thread Steve Ebersole
My understanding is that the return types for aggregation function in criteria queries should follow the same rules as defined for JPAQL. So first, is that a correct understanding? The confusion is the type signatures of the builder methods, espcially the ones that "change" based on the argument

Re: [hibernate-dev] criteria + SUM

2010-01-07 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
We fail because we return Long and not Integer, correct? That's one of the latest changes we did in the spec (the addition of the sumAsLong / sumAsDouble, especially for the case where you sum two integers. " >> We will add the following 2 methods to the QueryBuilder(now CriteriaBuilder) >>i

Re: [hibernate-dev] Reelase for

2010-01-07 Thread Steve Ebersole
I went ahead and set up this next release in JIRA (3.5.0-Beta-3) and moved all unresolved issues to the 3.5 working release. If there is anything you need in 3.5.0-Beta-3 that is not there speak up now (by scheduling the corresponding JIRA issue) or forever hold your piece :) On Thu, 2010-01-07