Re: [hibernate-dev] IdentifierGenerator, which *may* implement PostInsertIdentifierGenerator

2009-12-06 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hello, Steve, yes the answer for "why native?" is portability, indeed. Could you please enlighten me, what the "enhanced" generators precisely are and why they would fix my problem? At least, I don't find the term "enhanced" in the IdentifierGeneratorFactory and neither of the classes implementin

Re: [hibernate-dev] IdentifierGenerator, which *may* implement PostInsertIdentifierGenerator

2009-12-06 Thread Steve Ebersole
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/New323HibernateIdentifierGenerators On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 14:53 +0100, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Hello, Steve, > > yes the answer for "why native?" is portability, indeed. > > Could you please enlighten me, what the "enhanced" generators > precisely are and why they

Re: [hibernate-dev] Missing artifact org.jboss.javaee:jboss-jacc-api:jar:1.1.1-SNAPSHOT:provided

2009-12-06 Thread Steve Ebersole
1) http://repository.jboss.com/maven2 is not a SNAPSHOT repo, it only serves releases. You need http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2/ as you see certainly does contain that SNAPSHOT: http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/javaee/jboss-jacc-api/1.1.1-SNAPSHOT/ 2) Do you use jacc in conjunction w

Re: [hibernate-dev] Missing artifact org.jboss.javaee:jboss-jacc-api:jar:1.1.1-SNAPSHOT:provided

2009-12-06 Thread Paul Benedict
Thanks Steve. As for the the POM, perhaps it should also be given true? You're right; I don't use JACC. I don't always run in a JBoss container so it wouldn't be very valuable like in Tomcat, for example. Paul On 12/6/2009 9:29 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > 1) http://repository.jboss.com/maven2

Re: [hibernate-dev] Missing artifact org.jboss.javaee:jboss-jacc-api:jar:1.1.1-SNAPSHOT:provided

2009-12-06 Thread Steve Ebersole
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html#Dependency_Scope On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 09:37 -0600, Paul Benedict wrote: > Thanks Steve. > > As for the the POM, perhaps it should also be given > true? You're right; I don't use JACC. I don't > always run in

Re: [hibernate-dev] Annotation Processor for HV

2009-12-06 Thread Gunnar Morling
2009/12/4 Emmanuel Bernard > > On 3 déc. 09, at 23:09, Gunnar Morling wrote: > > 2009/12/3 Emmanuel Bernard > >> For sole determination of allowed types for constraint annotations you >> wouldn't need any validator implementations (or HV core) on the AP classpath >> when working with the mirror