use jboss maven repository for jboss stuff.
/max
Max Bowsher wrote:
With Hibernate Core 3.3.2 just released, it seems like a relevant time
to ask:
What happened to the ongoing struggle to get jboss artifacts synced to
maven central?
Could we please have an update of what the current status is
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> use jboss maven repository for jboss stuff.
>
> /max
As I have said several times on this list, the jboss maven repository is
sufficiently polluted with non-jboss artifacts with poor naming schemes
that conflict with central, and artifacts named the same as ones which
The JBoss repo is somewhat messy, yes. But so is central (new to you or
not), were they routinely allow artifacts to be moved around...
The JBoss repo was set up incorrectly as the person who manages it
eagerly agrees. Originally the "duplicates" were copied because JBoss
wanted (gasp) reproduci
Yes but central is full of broken JBoss stuff at un normalized
artifact ids. So you're screwed either way.
The only viable solution is to use sonar or artifactory and define the
rules you wish.
On Jun 25, 2009, at 14:05, Max Bowsher wrote:
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
use jboss maven reposi
Yes but central is full of broken JBoss stuff at un normalized
artifact ids. So you're screwed either way.
The only viable solution is to use sonar or artifactory and define the
rules you wish.
On Jun 25, 2009, at 14:05, Max Bowsher wrote:
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
use jboss maven reposi
Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> Yes but central is full of broken JBoss stuff at un normalized artifact
> ids. So you're screwed either way.
> The only viable solution is to use sonar or artifactory and define the
> rules you wish.
Personally I'm only using Hibernate itself, and no additional JBoss
stuf
Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Hibernate will never deploy directly to central. At best it was always
> going to just be synched across to central. So for Hibernate the JBoss
> repo is in fact the authoritative source. That's in direct difference
> to the other artifacts with which you deal it sounds l
Agreed. Even the Maven developers basically tell users (on irc anyway)
to never rely on direct repository access, and to instead use a
repository manager (ala nexus etc). In which case you should just
federate both jboss and central (plus codehaus...)
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 13:46 +0200, Max Ryda
Hibernate will never deploy directly to central. At best it was always
going to just be synched across to central. So for Hibernate the JBoss
repo is in fact the authoritative source. That's in direct difference
to the other artifacts with which you deal it sounds like.
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 16
I really have no clue. To me it is really a very moot point.
If you are interested, the person in charge of the JBoss maven repo is
Paul Gier; you know him on irc as pgier. Ask him the state of all this
stuff.
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:07 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > Hib
10 matches
Mail list logo
