Hello everyone,
During the last two weeks, I've been developing a small framework
allowing to create mappings on the fly, all the while allowing
existing sessions to "fail gracefully" (ie, if their session fails to
find a previously mapped column or table, they try with a newer
session). I don't u
Hi Chase,
sorry for the late answer; I've just looked at your code, it looks
very good and I'd like to apply this patch if Emmanuel and Hardy
agree?
There are no tests in your patch to verify this is actually useful, do
you have a good example of a ShardingProvider using it?
(tests are not only us
Hi Chase,
the problem I see is that if you have 3 customers having ids 34,35,202
you'll have to define 202 indexes
but you're right it should be a separate change.
The documentation of Hibernate Search is built from xml files
contained in the sources, you'll find them in
/src/main/docbook/en-US/mo
Hello,
I'm new to the list, so please forgive me if I miss some common
netiquette that is expected on this list.
I'd like to try to create a patch to solve 869, as well as support
querying of collections of composite types.
First, are there any guidelines of what I should and shouldn't do? I
Sorry for the delay Adam.
It depends what you are looking for:
Pure compliance:
- JPA 2 won't be final till sept '09 so nobody can be compliant till
then
- after JPA 2 is officially out, Sun tend to be late in giving the
TCK to their licensees despite the fact that the RI has passed the
T
Hi,
I've finished task concerning JMS replacement with JGroups. The patch is
attached. The general idea of pushing indexes through JG is assured, however
there are issues to improve (i.e. flexible JG protocol stack configuration).
Any review or advices would be welcome to make sure that I am not g
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 13:57 -0700, Daniel Pitts wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm new to the list, so please forgive me if I miss some common
> netiquette that is expected on this list.
>
> I'd like to try to create a patch to solve 869, as well as support
> querying of collections of composite types.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Ebersole
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 6:02 PM
> On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 13:57 -0700, Daniel Pitts wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm new to the list, so please forgive me if I miss some common
> > netiquette that is expected on this list.
> >
> > I'd l
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 17:11 +0200, Francis Galiegue wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> During the last two weeks, I've been developing a small framework
> allowing to create mappings on the fly, all the while allowing
> existing sessions to "fail gracefully" (ie, if their session fails to
> find a previ
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 18:18 -0700, Daniel Pitts wrote:
> That makes sense. If I submit a patch that basically refactors the CQT
> class, what might be considered when deciding on inclusion?
You mean is regards to the "cleanup"? Well, whether it makes sense
AFAIAC.
> I mean the propertyNames, pr
10 matches
Mail list logo