Hello
I am not sure this is where we should go, or at least, it depends.
here are three scenarii
#1 JMS replacement
If you want to use JGroups as a replacement for the JMS backend, then
I think you should write a jgroups backend. Check
org.hibernate.search.backend.impl.jms
In this case al
Hi,
I talked with Łukasz about this last wekk. Definitely, #1 and #3.
#2 I don't like either.
The befefit of #3 would also be that one could drop the requirement of
having a shared file system (NFS, NAS, ...) #3 should be quite easy to
implement. Maybe easy to get started with.
--Hardy
On Mon,
Hello,
I'm forwarding this email to Emmanuel and Hibernate Search dev, as I
believe we should join the discussion.
Could we keep both dev-lists (jbosscache-...@lists.jboss.org,
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org ) on CC ?
Sanne
2009/4/29 Manik Surtani :
>
> On 27 Apr 2009, at 05:18, Andrew Duckworth w
See some comments inline
On May 25, 2009, at 11:53, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
Hello,
I'm forwarding this email to Emmanuel and Hibernate Search dev, as I
believe we should join the discussion.
Could we keep both dev-lists (jbosscache-...@lists.jboss.org,
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org ) on CC ?
S
