On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:01:24 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard
wrote:
I am considering renaming @Digits to @DecimalRepresentation to make room
for the plural form
@interface DecimalRepresentations {
DecimalRepresentation[] value()
}
Any better name?
What' about @Number and @Numbers?
--Hardy
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:35:30 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard
wrote:
@Max.Plural( {
@Max(30, groups=JoeSixPack.class),
@Max(100, groups=PowerUser.class)
} )
+1 for this approach from me as well. Instead of Plural we could also
consider Many or Multiple.
--Hardy
this is not the semantic I would naturally apply to number. Not sure.
On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:12, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:01:24 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard > wrote:
I am considering renaming @Digits to @DecimalRepresentation to make
room for the plural form
@interface De
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:44:52 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard
wrote:
in the previous example, we would have two constraint violation reports:
- c.b is invalid
- d.b is invalid
Can you tell me on which side you are?
I agree there is a problem. I don't like the idea of getting two
constraint vi
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:46:59 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard
wrote:
this is not the semantic I would naturally apply to number. Not sure.
Why not? I think @Number or @Numeric would work quite well. I guess the
"problem"
is when you place either one of a String. I agree that
@Number-/@NumericRep
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:45:50 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard
wrote:
???UnsupportedTypeException or should it be
AmbiguousConstraintUsageException
Or just AmbiguousConstraintException?
Constraint implementation
ConstraintInitializationException
???initialize() must raise a RTE w
On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:52, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:44:52 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard > wrote:
in the previous example, we would have two constraint violation
reports:
- c.b is invalid
- d.b is invalid
Can you tell me on which side you are?
I agree there is a proble
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:38:32 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard
wrote:
On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:52, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:44:52 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard
wrote:
in the previous example, we would have two constraint violation
reports:
- c.b is invalid
- d.b is invalid
