Dear members of the Hibernate project,
we kindly ask for your participation in our survey on security assurance in
free/open source software.
Security assurances are confidence building activities through structured
design processes, documentation, and testing.
By participating in our survey y
Hi guys,
It has been a while since I've talked to most of the Hibernate team -
I hope all is well with everyone. I can say that I miss that I miss
working with the people, not so much the consulting travel :-P
Anyway, lemme get to business.
I upgraded from 3.2.5 to 3.2.6 and started getting exc
Hi Les,
I also had the same issue which was fixed using an update of the
transaction manager I use (Bitronix 1.3). A light JNDI server is now
embedded in it...
For info, the main developer of Bitronix is also working for Atomikos
(JTA world seems to be small ;-)
My JNDI hibernate.cfg.xml is now
Hi Joël,
Thanks for the feedback :)
And I know that works, but I feel like it is a hack. If the
underlying TM doesn't require JNDI, why force it just to get around a
lookup that is meaningless? Also, this would make a lot of other
people happy.
In other words, this problem wasn't in 3.2.5 and b
joël Winteregg wrote:
I also had the same issue which was fixed using an update of the
transaction manager I use (Bitronix 1.3). A light JNDI server is now
embedded in it...
This is an alternative that I've discussed with others off list. IMHO,
this better simulates the in-container JTA envir
I agree with you Chris, it does better simulate it. But Hibernate has
always been deployable outside of a container. Shouldn't it retain
that philosophy in its code base as well, architecting flexible
approaches that work seamlessly both in a JEE container and out?
That's my belief...
On Thu, J
Les Hazlewood wrote:
I agree with you Chris, it does better simulate it. But Hibernate has
always been deployable outside of a container. Shouldn't it retain
that philosophy in its code base as well, architecting flexible
approaches that work seamlessly both in a JEE container and out?
That's
My other belief, and one that is paramount in my own open source
project, is that a framework/toolkit always _should_ employ these
philosophies to support its user base and the other framework
communities that depend on it, if the solution is relatively trivial.
It is, IMHO, a good framework's res
Hi again,
> And I know that works, but I feel like it is a hack. If the
> underlying TM doesn't require JNDI, why force it just to get around a
> lookup that is meaningless? Also, this would make a lot of other
> people happy.
>
I agree with you... For me at least (I'm not a J2EE infrastructure
Nope - no coupling required :)
What I'm proposing is purely restricted to Hibernate's existing
dependencies and would work for any TM implementation, not just
Atomikos or JOTM.
It is the TM-specific TransactionManagerLookup (or perhaps a
TM-specific JTATransactionFactory) that would choose the
im
Les Hazlewood wrote:
Hi guys,
It has been a while since I've talked to most of the Hibernate team -
I hope all is well with everyone. I can say that I miss that I miss
working with the people, not so much the consulting travel :-P
Anyway, lemme get to business.
I upgraded from 3.2.5 to 3.2.6
Yes, I wholeheartedly agree. This is definitely a feature request
and not a bug.
I'll do that and see what you guys think. And if you or Steve want to
squash it, that's fine too, but at least I'm trying :-D
Thanks,
Les
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Chris Bredesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
I am not seeing exactly what it is you are asking...
Are you just looking for approval to use the Hibernate name? Or for
ideas on the port?
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 14:59 +0800, Lee Standen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I was wondering what the Hibernate developers thought about supporting
> a project to
Hey Les, yes it has been a long time.
Not sure why you find it so interesting considering that that JTA spec
itself *requires* binding into JNDI :) This is true both in the older
1.0.1B as well as the latest 1.1 specs. Thus I do not believe
that org.hibernate.transaction.JTATransaction is the c
I'm not particularly worried about the name, but my goal is to preserve
compatibility with hibernate, so you can pick up your mapping file, and drop
it into a Java or .NET application with only minor changes (much the same as
you can do with Hibernate => Nhibernate I guess.
I was more chasing some
15 matches
Mail list logo
