Chances are that if you need to use exactly the field name, using a
TwoWayStringBridge is what you need.
On Jun 16, 2008, at 04:20, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:22:22 +0200, Emmanuel Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
I am not sure if I like lazy field loading in the se
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:22:22 +0200, Emmanuel Bernard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not sure if I like lazy field loading in the second case. The
proposed metadata to FieldBridge (FieldBridge.fieldNameStrategy()
EXACT, IN_NAMESPACE, NON_SAFE) seems very artificial. If we extend the
Field
