I think it was Brett and I mentioned that we don’t need commons-logging anymore
-
Best Regards,
Strong Liu
http://about.me/stliu/bio
On 2013Oct 9, at 6:18 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I thought I remember someone (Brett? Strong?) going through an cleaning
> up referen
For info, I've made public the page describing the log recommendations for
JBoss projects
http://community.jboss.org/wiki/HowtologinJBossprojects
It seems that the FATAL-INFO level with named categories and class based
categories for DEBUG-TRACE fits nicely.
Note that i18n debug and trace levels
Forgot to answer this question.
I like the idea of different channels, but not sure how complex it will
get.
How many channels did you have in mind?
Also, the more complex the higher the chances that you use the logging
framework in
unintended ways.
--Hardy
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:25:53 +020
category is what you use to configure logging in the major logging
frameworks.
No, class name and line number are part of what is called "location
information" which is usually a formatting option. But its expensive,
as it generally means the logging framework creating an Exception and
lookin
What's the implication to the logged message content behind using a class name
vs. a subsystem name as a category? Would it be correct to assume the class
name/line number would only appear in the message if you use the class name as
a category? Or is that something more tied to the underlying
