Also, does anyone know if creating symlinks via sftp works against the doc
server?
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:16 AM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Reviving this to finish the discussion about creation of the `current`
> symlink...
>
> I think we can actually script this update to the `current` symlink.
Reviving this to finish the discussion about creation of the `current`
symlink...
I think we can actually script this update to the `current` symlink. We'd
simply limit the creation (and thus transfer) of the symlink when we do a
release that ends in "0.Final" (maybe for CR releases too). For
ex
Maybe the better option is to have the build simply upload to the versioned
docs dir (orm/5.0, orm/5.1, etc) and to manage the `current` symlink by
hand. That really only needs to change when the next feature release
becomes stable.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:40 PM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I fix
I fixed the symlinks on the doc server as follows:
1. created a `/orm/current` symlink pointing to `/orm/5.1`
2. updated `/stable/orm` to point to `/orm/current`
3. updated `/stable/core` to point to `/stable/orm` (I could not
remember what it pointed to previously).
So as of right n
no, I'll do it
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:05 PM Vlad Mihalcea
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't changed the current build process. I'll have to investigate
> where to make the change.
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Steve Ebersole
> wrote:
>
>> I thought you had updated the documentation build to
I need to deal with the new link ontology we decided on for the doc server
anyway
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:08 PM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> no, I'll do it
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:05 PM Vlad Mihalcea
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I haven't changed the current build process. I'll have to investigat
Hi,
I haven't changed the current build process. I'll have to investigate where
to make the change.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I thought you had updated the documentation build to build this?
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:31 PM Vlad Mihalcea
> wrote:
>
>> Congr
I thought you had updated the documentation build to build this?
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:31 PM Vlad Mihalcea
wrote:
> Congrats! I checked the docs but the User Guide is still the old one:
>
> http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/5.1/userGuide/en-US/html_single/
>
> Should we make the switch i
Congrats! I checked the docs but the User Guide is still the old one:
http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/5.1/userGuide/en-US/html_single/
Should we make the switch in a future release?
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> Congratulations!!
>
> On 10 February 2016 at 18:16
Congratulations!!
On 10 February 2016 at 18:16, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> The release build is done. Push away!
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:14 AM Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
>>
>>
> ___
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> htt
The release build is done. Push away!
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:14 AM Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
>
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
11 matches
Mail list logo
