On 17 July 2015 at 10:07, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Interesting, so they'd really block the link from being shared due to the
> broken author meta-data.
And worse: you get strongly penalized in SEO terms. Next we should add
valid microdata.
-- Sanne
>
> 2015-07-17 11:03 GMT+02:00 Sanne Grinovero
Interesting, so they'd really block the link from being shared due to the
broken author meta-data.
2015-07-17 11:03 GMT+02:00 Sanne Grinovero :
> G+ link sharing works now. Thanks Gunnar and Emmanuel for the quick
> "meta fix" WEBSITE-380!
>
> Cheers,
> Sanne
>
> On 16 July 2015 at 11:37, Sanne G
G+ link sharing works now. Thanks Gunnar and Emmanuel for the quick
"meta fix" WEBSITE-380!
Cheers,
Sanne
On 16 July 2015 at 11:37, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Ah, that helps; I hadn't understood you were talking about the "share
> link" feature.
>
> I could reproduce the problem now; it seems one
Ah, that helps; I hadn't understood you were talking about the "share
link" feature.
I could reproduce the problem now; it seems one probable cause is the
in.relation.to website to contain invalid microdata. I wanted to
improve the microdata anyway so I'll have a look this evening.
Thanks,
Sanne
But his this a real "shared link"? This does not work for me with the CR2
post, also not on my personal account.
2015-07-16 12:13 GMT+02:00 Sanne Grinovero :
> I had no problems have anyone post on g+ and link to in.relation.to:
> https://plus.google.com/101574584265991227194/posts/AsM3PUHwLBX
>
I had no problems have anyone post on g+ and link to in.relation.to:
https://plus.google.com/101574584265991227194/posts/AsM3PUHwLBX
Is there some limitation on the Hibernate.org g+ specifically?
On 15 July 2015 at 17:20, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Gunnar mentioned having the same problem. On the
Gunnar mentioned having the same problem. On the Hibernate.org g+ page, if
I try to add a post that contains a link to our in.relation.to domain, it
will not let me create the post.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:47 AM Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> Could you elaborate please? You could not link to our d
Could you elaborate please? You could not link to our domain?
On 15 Jul 2015 15:33, "Steve Ebersole" wrote:
> FWIW, I just tried to use the new in.relation.to url in g+ post but it was
> not accepted. Google did not say anything specific about why it was not
> accepted.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015
FWIW, I just tried to use the new in.relation.to url in g+ post but it was
not accepted. Google did not say anything specific about why it was not
accepted.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:25 AM andrea boriero wrote:
> I have just modified the post, need only to push.
> Emmanuel can you just take ca
I have just modified the post, need only to push.
Emmanuel can you just take care of mails, g+ etc?
On 9 July 2015 at 17:16, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> I’ll do this.
>
>
> > On 09 Jul 2015, at 15:35, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> >
> > Too late now. I am off for some hiking / camping with my fiancé.
I’ll do this.
> On 09 Jul 2015, at 15:35, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
> Too late now. I am off for some hiking / camping with my fiancé.
>
> If someone could do me a favor and take the blog post from staging (or
> better yet, the post from Github release) and make a post on production and
> finis
Too late now. I am off for some hiking / camping with my fiancé.
If someone could do me a favor and take the blog post from staging (or
better yet, the post from Github release) and make a post on production and
finish announcing the release (email, g+, etc) I would really appreciate it.
On Wed,
> As I said, I had trouble writing this blog in the new asciidoctor stuff. I
> had some trouble getting ruby etal set up locally. Sanne had mentioned
> that I could just push to staging branch and CI would automatically build
> it for me and I could check it that way. Well the CI job clearly saw
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 07:17:07PM +, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> As I said, I had trouble writing this blog in the new asciidoctor stuff. I
> had some trouble getting ruby etal set up locally
Can you provide any more info than that? I am happy to help you setting
this up, but I need some m
Wow, now it shows up. Like almost an hour later.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 2:17 PM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> As I said, I had trouble writing this blog in the new asciidoctor stuff.
> I had some trouble getting ruby etal set up locally. Sanne had mentioned
> that I could just push to staging branch
As I said, I had trouble writing this blog in the new asciidoctor stuff. I
had some trouble getting ruby etal set up locally. Sanne had mentioned
that I could just push to staging branch and CI would automatically build
it for me and I could check it that way. Well the CI job clearly saw my
chan
16 matches
Mail list logo
