I tried to verify our generated html with jtidy, but it reports too
many "false alarms" (e.g. usage of % in td/th width).
Anyone knows of a better verifier that can be used programmatically in
unittests ?
The w3c validators are normally the best bet, but they tend to be
online tools rather th
On 24/10/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
done.
Thanks.
I tried to verify our generated html with jtidy, but it reports too
many "false alarms" (e.g. usage of % in td/th width).
Anyone knows of a better verifier that can be used programmatically in
unittests ?
The w3c val
On 24/10/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
tried to look at them but they were a big mesh of perl code or worse so
not really "managable" :)
Nasty, best leave that alone then.
well, they have an outdated specific test for not using % in th and td
with attribute.
It is underst
Any HTML/CSS that looks good on IE, FireFox and Opera (and are simple to
generate) is my minimum requirements ;)
Cool, well if I get the time after adding the features I need then
I'll have a stab.
Cool.
--
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen
Hibernate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
done.
I tried to verify our generated html with jtidy, but it reports too
many "false alarms" (e.g. usage of % in td/th width).
Anyone knows of a better verifier that can be used programmatically in
unittests ?
On 24/10/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've applied your
On 24/10/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've applied your current patches now. thanks.
Thanks Max. If you could be so kind to apply the new reformatted
templates (HBX-789) then I can base my next batch of patches from
that.
Mark
I've applied your current patches now. thanks.
/max
On 23/10/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've started some minor patches today, but was wondering if anyone
> would be offended if I reformatted the hbm2doc templates? The
> inconsistent indentation makes patching them
