Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM master

2014-11-18 Thread Steve Ebersole
ings get sorted out. > > - Original Message - > > From: "Steve Ebersole" > > To: "hibernate-dev" > > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 4:00:38 AM > > Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM master > > > > FYI, does anyone need metamo

Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM master

2014-11-18 Thread Gail Badner
v" > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 4:00:38 AM > Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM master > > FYI, does anyone need metamodel-old anymore? Can I just delete that one > upstream? > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > > > Ok, all done now.

Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM master

2014-10-29 Thread Steve Ebersole
FYI, does anyone need metamodel-old anymore? Can I just delete that one upstream? On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > Ok, all done now. So at this point: > > 1) upstream/metamodel-old is the "metamodel" code as of the point before > when we merged it to master > 2) upstrea

Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM master

2014-10-29 Thread Steve Ebersole
Ok, all done now. So at this point: 1) upstream/metamodel-old is the "metamodel" code as of the point before when we merged it to master 2) upstream/metamodel is the current state of metamodel work 3) upstream/master is currently the same as 4.3. It is the base from which I will start the discus

Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM master

2014-10-29 Thread Steve Ebersole
I just noticed that the old metamodel branch was still around upstream. So far I have: 1) moved upstream/metamodel -> upstream/metamodel-old 2) deleted upstream/metamodel 3) moved upstream/master -> upstream/metamodel I'll wait a few minutes still before deleting master and re-priming it from 4.