Thanks Gail!
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Gail Badner wrote:
> I created https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-11982.
>
> I just committed the one-line change without a unit test. Unless I hear
> otherwise, I'll assume that's OK and I'll plan to release on Wednesday,
> 9/13.
>
> Regards
I created https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-11982.
I just committed the one-line change without a unit test. Unless I hear
otherwise, I'll assume that's OK and I'll plan to release on Wednesday,
9/13.
Regards,
Gail
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Gail Badner wrote:
> OK, I'll fix it
OK, I'll fix it for 5.2.11.
Thanks,
Gail
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Steve Ebersole
wrote:
> I'm fine with that. That method really does not fit with the paradigm
> which needs that pulse.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:36 PM Sanne Grinovero
> wrote:
>
> > On 11 September 2017 at 16:14
I'm fine with that. That method really does not fit with the paradigm
which needs that pulse.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:36 PM Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 11 September 2017 at 16:14, Guillaume Smet
> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Any comment on this?
> >
> > After reading the javadoc of SharedSession
On 11 September 2017 at 16:14, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Any comment on this?
>
> After reading the javadoc of SharedSessionContractImplementor, I think we
> should probably just get rid of the `checkTransactionSynchStatus();` call
> in getInterceptor().
>
> I don't think getInterceptor() sh
Hi!
Any comment on this?
After reading the javadoc of SharedSessionContractImplementor, I think we
should probably just get rid of the `checkTransactionSynchStatus();` call
in getInterceptor().
I don't think getInterceptor() should be responsible for joining the
transaction.
What do you all thi
