On 6 February 2017 at 13:19, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Fwiw Dialect discovery is far and away the preferred solution for
> "specifying" Dialect. That said, I am ok with splitting off Dialect(s)
> specific to MariaDB.
Right I agree auto-detection is preferred. Are you suggesting that we
actually ca
Ditto -- a cleanup would be fantastic.
On 02/06/2017 10:20 AM, andrea boriero wrote:
> +1 for MariaDB dialect.
>
> +1 also for the deprecated repos
>
>
> On 6 February 2017 at 15:05, Vlad Mihalcea wrote:
>
>> I'll create a new Jira issue for the MariaDB Dialects.
>>
>> For the deprecated Dialects
+1 for MariaDB dialect.
+1 also for the deprecated repos
On 6 February 2017 at 15:05, Vlad Mihalcea wrote:
> I'll create a new Jira issue for the MariaDB Dialects.
>
> For the deprecated Dialects, I'd just remove them. But the Javassist
> support can be moved to a to a hibernate-legacy GitHub
+1 for both
On 02/06/2017 08:19 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Fwiw Dialect discovery is far and away the preferred solution for
> "specifying" Dialect. That said, I am ok with splitting off Dialect(s)
> specific to MariaDB.
>
> Relatedly, I wonder if we should begin to remove the Dialects we have
>
I'll create a new Jira issue for the MariaDB Dialects.
For the deprecated Dialects, I'd just remove them. But the Javassist
support can be moved to a to a hibernate-legacy GitHub repository.
Vlad
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Fwiw Dialect discovery is far and away the
Fwiw Dialect discovery is far and away the preferred solution for
"specifying" Dialect. That said, I am ok with splitting off Dialect(s)
specific to MariaDB.
Relatedly, I wonder if we should begin to remove the Dialects we have
marked as deprecated and whether we should consider a "legacy" repo
+1 to split them. I don't expect people to consider them "the same" anymore..
We probably should have split them even if there had been no technical
differences, just to make it clear which one needs to be configured.
On 6 February 2017 at 12:37, Vlad Mihalcea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had a very in