>>> +0,8 to optionally (with a boolean) enable interception on those
>>> methods. I guess it might be handy, but I'm not fully convinced on
>>> their use and it's yet-another-method, we're getting a bit complex.
>>> At least it's better than always applying the interceptor as the
>>> missing metho
On 14 May 2012 15:50, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On May 13, 2012, at 11:17 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
>> I agree as a user it's not simple to deal with two "massindex"
>> approaches, even worse if they behave differently. Your
>> straight-forward take on it is to make sure they behave the same
On May 13, 2012, at 11:17 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> I agree as a user it's not simple to deal with two "massindex"
> approaches, even worse if they behave differently. Your
> straight-forward take on it is to make sure they behave the same, and
> I see some good value in it.. still we end up h
On May 14, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> So the essential question is, for people using index / purge /
> purgeAll, to have *manual* control.. by *manual* do we intend that the
> user as the last word, or should we still apply interceptors?
How does the her not have the last word if
Right I didn't mean to imply that they are just "building blocks" for
a do-it-yourself massindexer, just that that example using the
scrollable resultset is an interesting example of how they can be
used.
So the essential question is, for people using index / purge /
purgeAll, to have *manual* con
To me index / purge / purgeAll are not simply about what the MassIndexer does.
I can see use cases where you manually control indexing without considering
doing this en mass. remember, people can disable event based indexing.
On 13 mai 2012, at 23:17, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> [thread diverged, no
[thread diverged, not sure how to reply on each point.. so clean sheet:]
I agree as a user it's not simple to deal with two "massindex"
approaches, even worse if they behave differently. Your
straight-forward take on it is to make sure they behave the same, and
I see some good value in it.. still
On May 11, 2012, at 20:22, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> The reason I did map manual indexing to apply default is that I sided with
> Sanne s reasoning and I went on the side of caution with the API. I'd love to
> get more practical feedback before deciding to either:
>
> - stay as it is
> - m
> Since the filter is user defined, based on the fact that the user
> *knows* the blog needs to be indexed only when [businessrule],
> it's not hard to adapt the code using an
>
> if [businessrule] {
> fulltextSession#index( e );
> }
> else {
> log.discardBlogDRAFTFromIndex( e );
> }
Not hard,
The reason I did map manual indexing to apply default is that I sided with
Sanne s reasoning and I went on the side of caution with the API. I'd love to
get more practical feedback before deciding to either:
- stay as it is
- map indexing and purge to the interceptor - I don't think we can safel
On 11 May 2012 17:15, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On May 11, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
>> I was expecting you to argue about it,
>
> :-)
>
>
>> and therefore I concede that
>> some docs clarification at least is strongly required,
>
> at the very least
no doubt
>
>> but I disag
On May 11, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> I was expecting you to argue about it,
:-)
> and therefore I concede that
> some docs clarification at least is strongly required,
at the very least
> but I disagree on the expectations:
>
> I see a fundamental difference in behaviour ex
I was expecting you to argue about it, and therefore I concede that
some docs clarification at least is strongly required, but I disagree
on the expectations:
I see a fundamental difference in behaviour expectations between
a) "sync up database and index"
b) "index Entries A and B now"
In the f
Really? I would argue differently.
Let's take the blog example where I only want to index blog entries which are
published. Adding the interceptor and relying on automatic indexing will not
index un-published entries. Great.
If I, however, want/ have to re-index my blog entries via the API the
14 matches
Mail list logo
