I don't think you can realistically remove a tech preview flag from a query API
which does not have a decent query builder :)
On 7 janv. 2010, at 14:33, Manik Surtani wrote:
>
> On 7 Jan 2010, at 13:18, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
>> Most people are on JPA 2 atm. so Hibernate Search 3.2 is not g
On 7 Jan 2010, at 13:18, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> Most people are on JPA 2 atm. so Hibernate Search 3.2 is not getting as much
> attention as hoped.
> We need to do 3.2 beta2 3.2 beta 3 3.2 final and then we can think about a
> 3.3 timeframe.
>
> In particular the Query DSL has not moved (I t
Most people are on JPA 2 atm. so Hibernate Search 3.2 is not getting as much
attention as hoped.
We need to do 3.2 beta2 3.2 beta 3 3.2 final and then we can think about a 3.3
timeframe.
In particular the Query DSL has not moved (I think it's more important for
infinispan than HSEARCH-397).
On
