On Oct 19, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 19, 2010, at 11:07 am, John Verhaeg wrote:
>> I'm currently going through the codebase trying to convert our use of slf4j
>> for logging to jboss-logging. In doing so, I've noticed that all of the
>> current loggers are na
On Tuesday, October 19, 2010, at 11:07 am, John Verhaeg wrote:
> I'm currently going through the codebase trying to convert our use of slf4j
> for logging to jboss-logging. In doing so, I've noticed that all of the
> current loggers are named using the package-qualified name of the
> enclosing cla
