On 5 November 2015 at 14:23, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> 2015-11-05 15:11 GMT+01:00 Sanne Grinovero :
>> Hi,
>> I realize it was a mistake to create it that soon, but it's too late
>> now: we have contributions being developed from that branch.
>
> Who, where? I don't see any branch off 5.5 on GH. As
Personally I see this as a pragmatic versus correct discussion. To me,
once you release a final you should create it's branch. The pragmatism
comes from the fact that following this "correct" approach causes a lot of
"extra work" (extra until there is an actual deviation).
I regularly do this
2015-11-05 15:11 GMT+01:00 Sanne Grinovero :
> Hi,
> I realize it was a mistake to create it that soon, but it's too late
> now: we have contributions being developed from that branch.
Who, where? I don't see any branch off 5.5 on GH. As said the branches
are identical, so even if someone has deve
Hi,
I realize it was a mistake to create it that soon, but it's too late
now: we have contributions being developed from that branch.
Keep in mind 5.5 will definitely need long term maintenance as it's
the version picked for integration in WildFly 10 and all depending
platforms, so it's not that t
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 08:46:45AM +0100, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Sanne, all,
>
> Could we please drop the 5.5 branch in the upstream repo. It matches
> exactly master (apart from the POM versions), so there is really no
> good reason to have it at this point IMHO.
+1
--Hardy
___
