On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:09:33 -0300, Emmanuel Bernard
wrote:
> OK I understand better now, sorry about that. It's just that I find it
> weird that an AP cannot access the project CP as is. That would not be
> the first weird thing in the Java platform :)
> It might make sense to push some of the
On 6 déc. 09, at 22:51, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
>
> 2009/12/4 Emmanuel Bernard
>
> On 3 déc. 09, at 23:09, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
>> 2009/12/3 Emmanuel Bernard
>> For sole determination of allowed types for constraint annotations
>> you wouldn't need any validator implementations (or HV core
2009/12/4 Emmanuel Bernard
>
> On 3 déc. 09, at 23:09, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
> 2009/12/3 Emmanuel Bernard
>
>> For sole determination of allowed types for constraint annotations you
>> wouldn't need any validator implementations (or HV core) on the AP classpath
>> when working with the mirror
On 3 déc. 09, at 23:09, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> 2009/12/3 Emmanuel Bernard
> For sole determination of allowed types for constraint annotations
> you wouldn't need any validator implementations (or HV core) on the
> AP classpath when working with the mirror API, just BV API and the
> AP it
