Re: [hibernate-dev] [validator] Time to let go

2011-01-17 Thread Gunnar Morling
Hi, I'm definitely for removing the legacy project, too. Given it will very likely never change again I think a new repo for it would do more harm than good, so I'm also preferring option 1. If it is for any reason still needed for Seam or similar we might remove the legacy module from the aggreg

Re: [hibernate-dev] [validator] Time to let go

2011-01-17 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
On 17 janv. 2011, at 13:18, Hardy Ferentschik wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:06:07 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard > wrote: > >> The main reason for keeping it around is that the latest stable release of >> Seam still uses it. >> But the idea of tagging + deleting is find by me. > > Ok. I would hop

Re: [hibernate-dev] [validator] Time to let go

2011-01-17 Thread Hardy Ferentschik
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:06:07 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > The main reason for keeping it around is that the latest stable release > of Seam still uses it. > But the idea of tagging + deleting is find by me. Ok. I would hope though that any new release would use Validator 4 > BTW how do

Re: [hibernate-dev] [validator] Time to let go

2011-01-17 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
The main reason for keeping it around is that the latest stable release of Seam still uses it. But the idea of tagging + deleting is find by me. BTW how do you split a Git repo? simply by cloning and removing what you don't want? On 17 janv. 2011, at 11:29, Hardy Ferentschik wrote: > Hi, > >