Sorry I read too fast. Indeed if you are working from the representation in
memory and not considering what happened in the backend, I don’t think it
should happen or as you say something is fishy (like multi-thread abuse).
On 30 Sep 2014, at 09:10, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Thanks for coming ba
Thanks for coming back on this :)
2014-09-29 18:16 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bernard :
> I think that can happen due to the weak transactional guarantees the
> underlying backend provides.
> Why do you ask? (that is if you remember as this email is quite old -
> nothing like being stuck on a place for 1
I think that can happen due to the weak transactional guarantees the
underlying backend provides.
Why do you ask? (that is if you remember as this email is quite old -
nothing like being stuck on a place for 12 hours to catch up ;) ).
On Wed 2014-08-27 22:40, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
On 27 August 2014 21:40, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> Is there any legitimate case where Association#remove(RowKey) is invoked
> for a key which is not present in that specific association instance? Or
> would this indicate some programming error?
If the datastore supports eventual co
