On 2 Jan 2014, at 14:30, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>> Sanne questioned the idea of built-in bridge and would rather have all
>>> bridges handled equally and not allow duplication.
>>> It seems that the current set of bridges cannot support that approach. When
>>> I developed the code, I realise
On 01 Apr 2014, at 22:07, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On 1 Jan 2014, at 16:36, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
>> ## Handling duplicates
>>
>> I had in mind the following logic.
>>
>> Prevent custom bridge providers to offer bridges in the same situation.
>
> What do you mean with "in the same
