Yes that looks fishy. The only explanation I can see is if that approach is
supposed to use the byte code enhancement lazy as opposed to proxy but AFAIR we
have different annotations to express that.
On 15 Mar 2014, at 18:48, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> There is a test currently failing with the n
+1 -- I don't think that should be valid. Conceptually, it makes no sense.
I'm wondering if that came from a contributor that was simply trying to make it
LAZY, but didn't understand how to properly do that with annotations...
Brett Meyer
Red Hat, Hibernate ORM
- Original Message -
Fr
