Re: [hibernate-dev] master and metamodel branches

2012-06-05 Thread Hardy Ferentschik
On Jun 5, 2012, at 5:51 PM, John Verhaeg wrote: > > On Jun 5, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > >> Out of curiosity, why 2 merges? > > I was just thinking it might help reduce the number of potential conflicts > during the first merge. If not, then one is fine in my mind. Same here

Re: [hibernate-dev] master and metamodel branches

2012-06-05 Thread John Verhaeg
On Jun 5, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > Out of curiosity, why 2 merges? I was just thinking it might help reduce the number of potential conflicts during the first merge. If not, then one is fine in my mind. ___ hibernate-dev mailing l

Re: [hibernate-dev] master and metamodel branches

2012-06-05 Thread Steve Ebersole
If we merge (not rebase) then we should be fine to do it without everyone having to push first. So lets set a time for this to happen. I really want to hold off branching for JPA 2.1 implementation work until this happens, so the sooner the better. Tomorrow (6/5)? Out of curiosity, why 2 mer

Re: [hibernate-dev] master and metamodel branches

2012-06-05 Thread John Verhaeg
+1 for early merges and Hardy's suggestion to merge first w/o combining test & matrix, then again after combining. On Jun 5, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Hardy Ferentschik wrote: > > On Jun 5, 2012, at 3:56 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > >> Would we merge the directories on each branch and then merge branch

Re: [hibernate-dev] master and metamodel branches

2012-06-05 Thread Hardy Ferentschik
On Jun 5, 2012, at 3:56 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > Would we merge the directories on each branch and then merge branches? From > what little I know of git I think this would be best. What's about doing first a merge keeping test and matrix and then combining test+matrix on master and do anot

Re: [hibernate-dev] master and metamodel branches

2012-06-05 Thread Steve Ebersole
Would we merge the directories on each branch and then merge branches? >From what little I know of git I think this would be best. On Jun 5, 2012 8:30 AM, "Hardy Ferentschik" wrote: > > On Jun 5, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > > > I want to start discussing a plan to integrate the mast

Re: [hibernate-dev] master and metamodel branches

2012-06-05 Thread Hardy Ferentschik
On Jun 5, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > I want to start discussing a plan to integrate the master and metamodel > branches together. > > One point of discussion is whether we want to pull master over on to > metamodel on a regular basis or whether we want to just wait until the >

[hibernate-dev] master and metamodel branches

2012-06-05 Thread Steve Ebersole
I want to start discussing a plan to integrate the master and metamodel branches together. One point of discussion is whether we want to pull master over on to metamodel on a regular basis or whether we want to just wait until the "very end" and do a single painful integration. I did some sear