I have no objections to exposing them directly rather than being part of
the test infrastructure.
On 12/20/18 5:16 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 1:33 PM Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> When discussing this before, there were some doubts about its actual
>> usefulness i
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 1:33 PM Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hey,
>
> When discussing this before, there were some doubts about its actual
> usefulness in non-testing, real-world code. E.g. you'd typically
> interact with multiple DAOs/repositories etc. and would have to
> somehow pass the session to
Hey,
When discussing this before, there were some doubts about its actual
usefulness in non-testing, real-world code. E.g. you'd typically
interact with multiple DAOs/repositories etc. and would have to
somehow pass the session to each of them.
One other thought is that inTransaction() should all
In tests we find our `#inSession` and `#inTransaction` methods very
useful. Which got me thinking that maybe we should support these on
SessionFactory directly:
public interface SessionFactory ... {
...
void inSession(Consumer action);
void inTransaction(Consumer action);
void inT
