I don't see an issue with changing that signature.
On 07/18/2012 10:27 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> thanks for the clarification.
>
> Wouldn't it make sense then to add the "int status" as an argument to
> afterAfterTransaction as well? As it seems some code looks for this by
> invokin
Hi Steve,
thanks for the clarification.
Wouldn't it make sense then to add the "int status" as an argument to
afterAfterTransaction as well? As it seems some code looks for this by
invoking tx.getStatus() in implementations of this method, but that
seems unsafe as I've found cases in which this ge
afterAfterTransaction is simply a part of the afterTransaction process.
afterTransaction is split into a number of steps, afterAfterTransaction
simply being the last step in that process.
On 07/18/2012 05:15 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm puzzled about the implementation we have in
>
Hi all,
I'm puzzled about the implementation we have in
org.hibernate.engine.transaction.internal.jta.JtaTransaction
regarding after-transaction completion handling.
Looking at the two methods:
afterAfterCompletion(); <-- note the "After - After" prefix
afterTransactionCompletion(int status);
