Ok, I'll call it a quorum in terms of making this Beta2...
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Steve Ebersole
wrote:
> WRT performance testing... well I think we can agree that the performance
> would not be worse. So I don't see the harm in that regard.
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Sann
WRT performance testing... well I think we can agree that the performance
would not be worse. So I don't see the harm in that regard.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> On 29 April 2015 at 16:54, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > For EntityKey vs CacheKey, that reminds me... ha
On 29 April 2015 at 16:54, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> For EntityKey vs CacheKey, that reminds me... have we ever unified the
> differing notions of a "cache key"? Aka, just have the RegionFactory build
> CachKeys for us so that we don't have to always be re-wrapping...
Right that's what I'm referri
I agree with the Beta2 in order to give time to try out the Transaction
Changes :)
+1
On 29 April 2015 at 16:20, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I had originally planned on today's release being the first CR for 5.0. I
> am re-thinking that now. Here is why...
>
> 1) If we were to ever start offering
For EntityKey vs CacheKey, that reminds me... have we ever unified the
differing notions of a "cache key"? Aka, just have the RegionFactory build
CachKeys for us so that we don't have to always be re-wrapping...
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> I would love that as I s
I would love that as I should really check on two last things but
couldn't make time yet.
- the Locking API
- checking if what I'm having in mind regarding EntityKey vs CacheKey
needs any API change
+1 for a little extra time
Thanks!
Sanne
On 29 April 2015 at 16:22, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Oh
Oh... and I'd *like* to get the Karaf features file figured out. Not
blocker, but a nice to have.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Steve Ebersole
wrote:
> I had originally planned on today's release being the first CR for 5.0. I
> am re-thinking that now. Here is why...
>
> 1) If we were to
I had originally planned on today's release being the first CR for 5.0. I
am re-thinking that now. Here is why...
1) If we were to ever start offering a typed API, a major major release
would be the time to do that. However, we'd still have the "load() + proxy
interfaces" issue to decide a cour
