I was really only considering XML metadata when writing that generator
and thus did not even consider the scenario of defining the identifier
annotations on a superclass.
I do not like this proposal as it completely whacks one of the
intended benefits of allowing sharing of segments between
I apologize if this is a 2nd posting.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Muldoon
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:04 AM
To: 'hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org'
Subject: [hibernate-dev] Short
I'm working with the org.hibernate.id.enhanced.TableGenerator class and I've
noticed a couple of shortcomings (imho). First and foremost, it creates one row
in the hibernate_sequences table for each configured segment_value (as opposed
to one row for each "target_table" as implemented within the
