2008/11/21 Hardy Ferentschik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:58:53 +0100, Sanne Grinovero
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I think the best option would be to have a separate
>> Executor for each directory provider: otherwise it could happen
>> that a slowly reacting index could bloc
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:58:53 +0100, Sanne Grinovero
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the best option would be to have a separate
Executor for each directory provider: otherwise it could happen
that a slowly reacting index could block correct operation from others,
as many queues could pileup
Sorry I wrote something stupid:
"3)use a size equal to the number of DirectoryProviders (this is the
optimal value, could be the default and be overriden by a parameter)"
is not true, this is not related to the optimal value. please discard
this option.
I think the best option would be to have a s
