Please do not backport any fixes that are not blockers. If you are not sure
if an issue is a blocker, then please ask before pushing to 5.0.
Thanks,
Gail
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinf
Stupid question probably: Why do we maintain 5.0.x at all, now that
5.1.0.Final is out? Is it that EAP or WF will continue to be using
5.0.x? If so, why is that, couldn't they move to 5.1?
2016-03-17 22:17 GMT+01:00 Sanne Grinovero :
> On 17 March 2016 at 17:40, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>> To be hon
On 17 March 2016 at 17:40, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> To be honest, I think its best if we somehow notify you for issues fixed
> that we think should be considered for inclusion on 5.0 branch and you can
> decide. A label or a filter. Something like that
+1 Shouldn't any bug be considered? Even i
On 18 Mar 2016 14:34, "Gunnar Morling" wrote:
>
> Stupid question probably: Why do we maintain 5.0.x at all, now that
> 5.1.0.Final is out? Is it that EAP or WF will continue to be using
> 5.0.x? If so, why is that, couldn't they move to 5.1?
EAP will be supported for many years so that requires
To be honest, I think its best if we somehow notify you for issues fixed
that we think should be considered for inclusion on 5.0 branch and you can
decide. A label or a filter. Something like that
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:30 PM Gail Badner wrote:
> Please do not backport any fixes that are no
2016-03-18 17:50 GMT+01:00 Sanne Grinovero :
>
> On 18 Mar 2016 14:34, "Gunnar Morling" wrote:
>>
>> Stupid question probably: Why do we maintain 5.0.x at all, now that
>> 5.1.0.Final is out? Is it that EAP or WF will continue to be using
>> 5.0.x? If so, why is that, couldn't they move to 5.1?
>
Sorry for the late response. Answers below...
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Gunnar Morling
wrote:
> 2016-03-18 17:50 GMT+01:00 Sanne Grinovero :
> >
> > On 18 Mar 2016 14:34, "Gunnar Morling" wrote:
> >>
> >> Stupid question probably: Why do we maintain 5.0.x at all, now that
> >> 5.1.0.Fin
