Yeah, frankly, they will be better served with an embedded MongoDB.
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Gunnar Morling
wrote:
> I don't mind removing it too much; but the idea behind it was no so
> much our own testing but rather to let OGM users test their apps with
> Fongo. I can see some value i
I don't mind removing it too much; but the idea behind it was no so
much our own testing but rather to let OGM users test their apps with
Fongo. I can see some value in that.
2017-04-27 17:46 GMT+02:00 Sanne Grinovero :
> +1 as I proposed the same thing a long time ago: if it's not the real
> thin
+1 as I proposed the same thing a long time ago: if it's not the real
thing we might as well mock all requests.
On 27 April 2017 at 16:40, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, in OGM, for MongoDB, we also support running the tests with Fongo which
> is an in-memory Java (more or less accurate) Mon
Hi,
So, in OGM, for MongoDB, we also support running the tests with Fongo which
is an in-memory Java (more or less accurate) MongoDB implementation.
It has a cost as Fongo behaves differently and we have to disable
tests/implement different tests without any real benefits IMHO:
- it's easy to run
