Yes, I am talking about the "collection table" name. That is why I
mentioned @JoinTable.
Again, we correctly produce the JPA-compliant name, as I said. The issue
is that we do not seem to produce the correct (what I expected) legacy name.
In trying to verify what that legacy name should be. R
See below...
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I think I may have goofed when I implemented some of the
> ImplicitNamingStrategy rules in 5.0.
>
> During that transition, I wrote a bunch of unit test in 4.3 to serve as a
> baseline to make sure I got the logic/rules right
I think I may have goofed when I implemented some of the
ImplicitNamingStrategy rules in 5.0.
During that transition, I wrote a bunch of unit test in 4.3 to serve as a
baseline to make sure I got the logic/rules right as I developed 5.0. But
I think I may have set up those initial 4.3 tests impro
