That would be great if it weren't date specific. I'd love to drop a link
for this on the website, but that would need to be date-agnostic
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Using UTC is not a bad idea.
>
> I like using timeanddate.com to plan meetings (see [1] for an examp
Using UTC is not a bad idea.
I like using timeanddate.com to plan meetings (see [1] for an example). You
add the cities of participants, get a time table with UTC and all involved
local times and can send a link such as [2] to the participants.
--Gunnar
[1]
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock
Relevant: "The Problem with Time & Timezones - Computerphile"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5wpm-gesOY
;)
- Original Message -
From: "Sanne Grinovero"
To: "Steve Ebersole"
Cc: "hibernate-dev"
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 10:42:29 AM
Subj
On 22 April 2014 15:37, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Is "UTC" subject to DST?
No, good point. Let's use UTC?
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>>
>> Tucsan AZ in the US does not recognize DST :
>> http://www.timeanddate.com/time/us/arizona-no-dst.html
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr
Is "UTC" subject to DST?
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Tucsan AZ in the US does not recognize DST :
> http://www.timeanddate.com/time/us/arizona-no-dst.html
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
>> On 22 April 2014 15:05, Steve Ebersole wrot
Tucsan AZ in the US does not recognize DST :
http://www.timeanddate.com/time/us/arizona-no-dst.html
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 22 April 2014 15:05, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > Now that Europe has had its time change, we should be back on for
> meeting @
> > 10 am
On 22 April 2014 15:05, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Now that Europe has had its time change, we should be back on for meeting @
> 10 am US Central TZ I think.
>
> Does that time still works for everyone?
+1
> Also, does it make sense to set up the meeting based on a DST-neutral
> calendar (so we avo
Now that Europe has had its time change, we should be back on for meeting @
10 am US Central TZ I think.
Does that time still works for everyone?
Also, does it make sense to set up the meeting based on a DST-neutral
calendar (so we avoid the different time changes)?
__
I won't be able to make the irc meeting today
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
I wont be able to make the meeting today. Something came up with kids and
school.
I'd say go ahead with the meeting if yall have stuff to discuss.
st...@hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
http
better for Gail, hour worse for Strong).
>
> Gail? Strong?
>
> On Thu 29 Mar 2012 01:55:54 PM CDT, Gail Badner wrote:
>> I'm mainly working days now, so Thursday 2.5 hours later or 3.5 hours later
>> is fine with me.
>>
>> - Original Message --
Original Message -
>> From: "Strong Liu"
>> To: "Steve Ebersole"
>> Cc: hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:06:31 PM
>> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Meeting
>>
>> I'm fine with pushing it 1 hour later
I'm mainly working days now, so Thursday 2.5 hours later or 3.5 hours later is
fine with me.
- Original Message -
> From: "Strong Liu"
> To: "Steve Ebersole"
> Cc: hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:06:31 PM
> Subje
I work on them a little periodically. But always, feel free to pick
some up and run with them.
On Wed 28 Mar 2012 09:07:09 PM CDT, Strong Liu wrote:
> anyone working on the pull requests? I saw there are some opened recently
> -
> Best Regards,
>
> Strong Liu http://hiber
anyone working on the pull requests? I saw there are some opened recently
-
Best Regards,
Strong Liu
http://about.me/stliu/bio
On Mar 29, 2012, at 2:57 AM, John Verhaeg wrote:
> I'm good to skip tomorrow, too.
>
> On Mar 28, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
>>
I'm fine with pushing it 1 hour later and I totally understand the painful of
getting up too earlier :D
but I remember Gail said she like the meeting time currently, 6 am, so she can
get some sleep after meeting, so, maybe we need to hear her option , anyway,
i'm fine with each time
--
I'm good to skip tomorrow, too.
On Mar 28, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Should we do a meeting tomorrow? I don't think we really have anything
> pressing at the moment.
>
> John personally, I dont think doing it at 8am our time (US Central) is too
> bad considering it is quite la
Sure, that's fine. I was only throwing it out if it wasn't inconvenient for
anyone else.
On Mar 28, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Should we do a meeting tomorrow? I don't think we really have anything
> pressing at the moment.
>
> John personally, I dont think doing it at 8am our
Should we do a meeting tomorrow? I don't think we really have anything
pressing at the moment.
John personally, I dont think doing it at 8am our time (US Central) is
too bad considering it is quite late evening already for Strong.
Strong, what do you think?
On Tue 27 Mar 2012 08:20:43 AM CD
I'm good with Thursday, too, but it would be nice if it was at least one hour
later.
On Mar 27, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Strong Liu wrote:
> okay, let's move it to thursday if no objections from others,
>
> moving this 2.5 hours later means 11:30pm for me
> -
> Best Regards,
>
On Mar 27, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Strong Liu wrote:
> okay, let's move it to thursday if no objections from others,
>
> moving this 2.5 hours later means 11:30pm for me
Right. Not so nice maybe ;-) Thursday works for me as well
___
hibernate-dev mailing l
I'm great with that.
On Mar 27, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am fine with moving the meeting 2 1/2 hours later. That's what we used to
> do anyways
> and it worked quite well imo.
>
> --Hardy
>
> On Mar 27, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
>> I got dropped
okay, let's move it to thursday if no objections from others,
moving this 2.5 hours later means 11:30pm for me
-
Best Regards,
Strong Liu
http://about.me/stliu/bio
On Mar 27, 2012, at 9:13 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I got dropped from my portable internet and cannot co
Hi,
I am fine with moving the meeting 2 1/2 hours later. That's what we used to do
anyways
and it worked quite well imo.
--Hardy
On Mar 27, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I got dropped from my portable internet and cannot connect at all at the
> moment. We really need to change thi
I got dropped from my portable internet and cannot connect at all at the
moment. We really need to change this meeting time. The current time is
unworkable for me every other week. Either we need to move this 2.5 hours
later or move it to another day. If another day, Thursday is the only other
day
Stuck in traffic and wont be able to make todays meeting
st...@hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
I also won't make the meeting. +1 for going Final.
Gail
- Original Message -
> From: "Steve Ebersole"
> To: "Emmanuel Bernard"
> Cc: hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Monday, November 7, 2011 7:56:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] meet
Yep, I replied on that thread.
On Mon 07 Nov 2011 09:48:46 AM CST, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> I have one subject on the table.
>
> Should we go for JBoss Logging Beta3 and release this week or wait for JBoss
> Logging 1.0.0.Final and wait till James or David release it.
> Based on that decision, I
I have one subject on the table.
Should we go for JBoss Logging Beta3 and release this week or wait for JBoss
Logging 1.0.0.Final and wait till James or David release it.
Based on that decision, I will release Commons Annotations and update Core.
On 7 nov. 2011, at 16:46, Steve Ebersole wrote:
I will not be able to make the meeting tomorrow. I think the only real
pressing thing on the docket would have been 4.0 Final go/no-go. I
think we are good to go for Final. We can just discuss that via email.
Or, y'all can still have a meeting if there are other things you would
like to disc
I will be late for todays meeting. We need to talk about moving the
meetings.
st...@hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
I will not be able to make the meeting today
st...@hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
Mostly we discussed the new metamodel code and whether to push forward
with it for 4.0. Also we discussed EntityManagerFactory building.
[05/02/11 11:01] Meeting ended Mon May 2 16:01:52 2011 UTC.
Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
[05/02/11 11:01] Minut
just to conclude this one - I had the bot configured to login before nickserv
responded; now it waits and thus it should get into hibernate-dev without
problems next time something causes a network outage ;)
/max
On Apr 26, 2011, at 20:53, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
>> jpav: no one started
> jpav: no one started the bot yet
> emmanuel: #startmeeting
> jpav: I don't think the bot is even running
> emmanuel: maxandersen: BOT
> emmanuel: Ok nevermind let's start
sorry for that one - not sure why but jbott was logged into all channels but
somehow either got rejected or kicked
emmanuel: hello everyone
gbadner: hi
emmanuel: have you guys started the meeting?
jpav: you just did I think
hardy: seems like it
sannegrinovero: hi emmanuel, no not yet
jpav: no one started the bot yet
emmanuel: #startmeeting
jpav: I don't think the bot is even running
emmanuel: maxandersen: BOOO
36 matches
Mail list logo
