looks good to me
> On 16 Dec 2015, at 14:04, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> we generally have been trying to target the versions of Infinispan
> provided by the WildFly version we're targeting for compatibility with
> a specific OGM release cycle.
>
> I would like to change that, an
Agreed :)
2015-12-18 11:53 GMT+01:00 Sanne Grinovero :
> To clarify, I don't have a immediate specific need to upgrade
> Infinispan within OGM, although since I'm working on an entire new
> module I'd rather code using the latest than have us to perform an
> upgrade later.
>
> But it's important w
To clarify, I don't have a immediate specific need to upgrade
Infinispan within OGM, although since I'm working on an entire new
module I'd rather code using the latest than have us to perform an
upgrade later.
But it's important we agree that rather than being obsessed with the
modules I can simp
On 12/16/2015 10:41 PM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there an actual need for 8.1 at this point (so does it provide
> features we really need in OGM?) or is this more a general/theoretical
> proposal?
>
> I like the idea in general, but we must carefully think through all
> the implications,
Hi,
Is there an actual need for 8.1 at this point (so does it provide
features we really need in OGM?) or is this more a general/theoretical
proposal?
I like the idea in general, but we must carefully think through all
the implications, such as what module slot to depend on in the OGM
dialect and
Hello all,
we generally have been trying to target the versions of Infinispan
provided by the WildFly version we're targeting for compatibility with
a specific OGM release cycle.
I would like to change that, and for example now switch to the latest
Infinispan 8.1.0.Final (rather than the one in W
