On 20 Nov 2009, at 12:10, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> I am very against the idea of runtime failures. That's the whole
> point of a type safe fluent API.
Yeah - understandable, the fewer exceptions thrown the better I guess.
> I would rather put the effort on the framework side than on the
>
I am very against the idea of runtime failures. That's the whole point
of a type safe fluent API.
I would rather put the effort on the framework side than on the
developer side.
A string query language or a dynamic language is better if you are not
bothered with helping the developer to write
Heya,
I was just thinking last night about a couple of things about the DSL.
Mainly, instead of having lots of return types, for example you
created a BooleanContext and a Negatable version if the Occur clause
was MUST. I was wondering, instead of having separate contexts, is it
easier to h
