After WildFly 11 and EAP 7.1.0.GA is released, or shortly thereafter, ORM
5.1 will no longer be publicly released, so it really is not worthwhile to
backport this to 5.1.
Sorry for asking, I didn't think it through before sending.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> As I sa
As I said initially, I agree that 5.2 should be updated. We just need to
be clear about the ramifications.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:14 AM Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> On 30 August 2017 at 16:53, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:38 AM Sanne Grinovero
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
On 30 August 2017 at 16:53, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:38 AM Sanne Grinovero
> wrote:
>>
>> On 29 August 2017 at 20:28, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>> > Then I think we should update 5.2 as well, but that creates an
>> > interesting
>> > concern in that the published artifact
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:38 AM Sanne Grinovero
wrote:
> On 29 August 2017 at 20:28, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > Then I think we should update 5.2 as well, but that creates an
> interesting
> > concern in that the published artifact name would change if I understand
> > correctly because it would
On 29 August 2017 at 20:28, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Then I think we should update 5.2 as well, but that creates an interesting
> concern in that the published artifact name would change if I understand
> correctly because it would change the artifact's classifier from
> `wildfly-10-dist` to `wildf
Then I think we should update 5.2 as well, but that creates an interesting
concern in that the published artifact name would change if I understand
correctly because it would change the artifact's classifier from
`wildfly-10-dist` to `wildfly-11-dist`. Things that refer to this artifact
as a depen
Hibernate ORM 5.1.x is in WF 11.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> What version of Hibernate does WF 11 include?
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017, 5:18 PM Gail Badner wrote:
>
>> This should be backported to 5.1 as well, shouldn't it?
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Steve
What version of Hibernate does WF 11 include?
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017, 5:18 PM Gail Badner wrote:
> This should be backported to 5.1 as well, shouldn't it?
>
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Steve Ebersole
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Thanks Sanne!
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 4:06 PM Sanne Grinovero
This should be backported to 5.1 as well, shouldn't it?
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks Sanne!
>
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 4:06 PM Sanne Grinovero
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Steve!
> > for reference JIRA and PR:
> > - https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH
+1
Thanks Sanne!
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 4:06 PM Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Thanks Steve!
> for reference JIRA and PR:
> - https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-11950
> - https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/1994
>
> I also just noticed that supporting only the latest is consist
Thanks Steve!
for reference JIRA and PR:
- https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-11950
- https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/1994
I also just noticed that supporting only the latest is consistent with
the expectations we set in the documentation.
Thanks,
Sanne
On 27 August 20
I personally agree that we should only be maintaining a single slice of the
version matrix here... a given ORM version against the latest Wildfly
version.
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017, 7:31 AM Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> WildFly 11 is coming: the version 11.0.0.CR1 was just released last week.
Hi all,
WildFly 11 is coming: the version 11.0.0.CR1 was just released last week.
The jipijapa integration point is slightly different.
It shouldn't be hard to patch the current ORM build for this, but I'm
wondering if we just want to update the target WF version, or start
producing sets for bot
13 matches
Mail list logo
